Thick Zn Drill Intersects Outside Existing Mineral Resource
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX Announcement | 11 July 2024
Variscan Mines Limited (ASX:VAR)
DRILLING DELIVERS THICK ZINC MINERALISATION OUTSIDE OF CURRENT
MINERAL RESOURCE AT SAN JOSE MINE
Highlights
•
•
•
•
•
•
More strong assay results received from current underground infill and extensional drilling
campaign at the San Jose Mine
Significant drilling results include:
o NDDT033
14.10 m @ 5.31% Zn, 0.44% Pb
o NDDT032
11.00 m @ 6.66% Zn, 0.72% Pb
o NDDT034
4.65 m @ 5.49% Zn, 0.14% Pb
o NDDT035
4.00 m @ 5.92% Zn, 0.26% Pb
Results indicate significant mineralisation intersected outside the existing Mineral Resource
Estimate model delivering growth potential
Drilling successfully tested new structural targets defined from recently completed structural
geology study
Upscaled underground drilling will continue targeting previously untested south west
extensions of San Jose Mine and into the Udias Mine complex
All new drilling results are to be incorporated into Mineral Resource Estimate update planned
later in CY2024.
Variscan’s Managing Director & CEO, Stewart Dickson said,
“This is another very pleasing set of results from our recent drilling at the San Jose Mine. The latest results
show excellent intercepts and grades outside the existing Mineral Resource Estimate model. With drilling
continuing, we remain on track to update the Mineral Resource Estimate by year end.
I am particularly excited about drilling in the Udias Mine for the first time. We believe that a sizeable tonnage
of high-grade zinc sulphide mineralization remains and has been untouched for decades. Using our own
portable drill rig and staff, we are able to conduct this program efficiently, cost effectively and with a high
degree of flexibility.
With the potential to grow the Mineral Resource, the opportunity to unlock further value from the outstanding
and newly enlarged Novales-Udias Project continues to be apparent. We continue to progress one of the
highest-grade, development stage zinc deposits in Europe towards re-starting production.”
Variscan Mines Limited (ASX:VAR) (“Variscan” or “the Company”) is pleased to report further high-grade
zinc intercepts from the ongoing underground diamond drilling program at the San Jose Mine, near Novales,
located in Cantabria, northern Spain.
As previously stated, the underground drilling program at the San Jose Mine has been upscaled in duration
and meterage. It is focused on expanding known zones of mineralization and discovering new zones with a
view to supporting an upgraded Mineral Resource Estimate.
The underground drilling program has the following objectives to support the eventual restart of production
at the San Jose Mine:
• drill-test structures within and beyond the defined Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) area
which have seen limited exploration drilling
• discover new zones of mineralization to increase overall size of current Mineral Resource
Estimate tonnage
• increase the confidence level of the orebody
Drilling supports structural geological interpretation and expands mineralization beyond existing
Mineral Resource Estimate model
The drilling results reported here have targeted Zn-Pb structures identified from geological assessment and
the structural targeting study (refer ASX announcement 19 February 2024) which has resulted in a
significantly improved understanding of the controls on multi-phase Zn-Pb mineralization at the San Jose
Mine.
Further, these areas were previously under-explored or under-exploited. The high-grade intercepts reported
hit the cross-cutting D2 structure linking Stope 200 and the La Caseta Trend.
This target area lies outside of the existing MRE model.
Figure 1. Plan view of new drill-hole data over the Central Zone, San Jose Mine
2
Figure 2. 3D view of drill-hole locations testing D2 structural targets between Stope 200 and the La Caseta
Trend in the San Jose Mine
Drilling indicates Mineral Resource Estimate upgrade potential
The newly identified mineralization arising from the positive drill results is outside the existing MRE and
shows the potential to increase the mineral resource. The drilling results demonstrate significant potential
for resource extensions both above and below the main gallery level.
Figure 3. Plan view of recently completed drill-hole locations in relation to the Mineral Resource Estimate
over the Central Zone, San Jose Mine
3
Figure 4. 3D section view of drill-hole locations testing D2 structural targets between Stope 200 and beside
the La Caseta Trend in the San Jose Mine
Figure 5. Diamond Drill Core from hole NDDT033 illustrating the interval of high-grade sphalerite hosted in
dolostone (interval shown: 4.15m - 19.3m).
4
Future drilling will test targets in the Udias Mine complex for the first time
Building on the success of the current underground drilling campaign, Variscan intends to commence drilling
in the Udias Mines which are linked to the San Jose Mine. This complex has not been drill-tested by Variscan
yet.
Variscan has complied and reported historical drill-hole data which indicates that there is excellent continuity
of mineralisation extending, along strike, in a south-westerly direction over 1.4km between the San Jose
Mine and the extensive Udias workings (Figure 6). The style of zinc mineralisation is identical to that found
at the San Jose Mine as it is predominately high-grade zinc sulphides and occurs at the same elevation (i.e.,
no vertical offset).
Figure 6. Plan view of drill-hole data illustrating significant exploration potential as mineralization extends
on strike to the south west of San Jose Mine (refer ASX release 7 August 2023)
5
Next Steps & Way Forward
Variscan continues to deliver on its upscaled underground drilling program. Further drilling results are
expected in the coming months and together with a planned surface drilling campaign in 2024, the objective
of delivering an MRE upgrade later this year remains extant.
ENDS
This ASX announcement has been approved by the Board and authorised for issue by Mr Stewart Dickson, Managing
Director and CEO, Variscan Mines Limited
For further information, please contact:
Variscan Mines Limited (ASX:VAR)
Stewart Dickson
Managing Director & CEO
E: stewart.dickson@variscan.com.au
T: +44 (0) 7799 694195
Media & Investor Enquiries
The Capital Network
Julia Maguire
E: julia@thecapitalnetwork.com.au
P: +61 2 8999 3699
About Variscan Mines Limited (ASX:VAR)
Variscan Mines Limited (ASX:VAR) is a growth oriented, natural resources company focused on the acquisition,
exploration and development of high-quality strategic mineral projects. The Company has compiled a portfolio of highimpact base-metal interests in Spain, Chile and Australia. Its primary focus is the development of its advanced zinc
projects in Spain. The Company’s name is derived from the Variscan orogeny, which was a geologic mountain building
event caused by Late Paleozoic continental collision between Euramerica (Laurussia) and Gondwana to form the
supercontinent of Pangea.
To learn more, please visit: www.variscan.com.au
For more information
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on X (formerly Twitter)
Visit our investor website: www.variscan.com.au
6
Project Summary
The Novales-Udias Project is located in the Basque-Cantabrian Basin, some 30km southwest from the regional capital,
Santander. The project is centred around the former producing San Jose underground mine with a large surrounding
area of exploration opportunities which include a number of satellite underground and surface workings and areas of
zinc anomalism identified from recent and historic geochemical surveys. Variscan has delineated a significant 9km
mineralised trend and a sub-parallel 3km trend from contemporary and historical data across both the Buenahora
exploration and Novales mining permits.
The San Jose Mine is nearby (~9km) to the world class Reocin Mine which is the largest known strata-bound carbonatehosted Zn-Pb deposit in Spain 1 and one of the world’s richest MVT deposits 2. Further it is within trucking distance
(~80km) from the San Juan de Nieva zinc smelter operated by Asturiana de Zinc (100% owned by Glencore). Significantly,
the Novales-Udias Project includes a number of granted mining tenements 3.
Novales-Udias Project Highlights
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Near term zinc production opportunity (subject to positive exploratory work)
Large tenement holding of +100 km2 (including a number of granted mining tenements)
Regional exploration potential for another discovery analogous to Reocin (total past production and remaining
resource 62Mt @ 8.7% Zn and 1.0% Pb 45)
Novales Mine is within trucking distance (~ 80km) from the zinc smelter in Asturias
Classic MVT carbonate hosted Zn-Pb deposits
Historic production of high-grade zinc; average grade reported as ~7% Zn 6
Simple mineralogy of sphalerite – galena – calamine
Mineralisation is strata-bound, epigenetic, lenticular and sub-horizontal
Reported historic production of super high grade ‘bolsas’ (mineralised pods and lenses) commonly 10-20% Zn
and in some instances +30% Zn 7
Assay results of recent targeted grab samples taken from within the underground Novales Mine recorded
31.83% Zn and 62.3% Pb 8
Access and infrastructure all in place
Local community and government support due to historic mining activity
Maiden MRE of 1.08 Mt at 10% Zn established in Q4/2023
1
Velasco, F., Herrero, J.M., Yusta, I., Alonso, J.A., Seebold, I. and Leach, D., (2003) ‘Geology and Geochemistry of the
Reocin Zinc-Lead Deposit, Basque-Cantabrian Basin, Northern Spain’ Econ. Geol. v.98, pp. 1371-1396.
2
Leach, D.L., Sangster, D.F., Kelley, K.D., Large, R.R., Garven, G., Allen, C.R., Gutzner, J., Walters, S., (2005) ‘Sedimenthosted lead-zinc deposits: a global perspective’. Econ. Geol. 100th Anniversary Special Paper 561 607
3 Refer to ASX announcement of 29 July 2019
4 Velasco, F., Herrero, J.M., Yusta, I., Alonso, J.A., Seebold, I. and Leach, D., 2003 - Geology and Geochemistry of the
Reocin Zinc-Lead Deposit, Basque-Cantabrian Basin, Northern Spain: in Econ. Geol. v.98, pp. 1371-1396.
5 Cautionary Statement: references in this announcement to the publicly quoted resource tonnes and grade of the Project
are historical and foreign in nature and not reported in accordance with the JORC Code 2012, or the categories of
mineralisation as defined in the JORC Code 2012. A competent person has not completed sufficient work to classify the
resource estimate as mineral resources or ore reserves in accordance with the JORC Code 2012. It is uncertain that
following evaluation and/or further exploration work that the foreign/historic resource estimates of mineralisation will be
able to be reported as mineral resources or ore reserves in accordance with the JORC Code 2012.
6 These figures have been taken from historical production data from the School of Mines in Torrelavega historical
archives.
7 Reports of the super high-grade mineralisation are supported with historical production data from the School of Mines
in Torrelavega historical archives. (Refer ASX release 29 July 2019)
8 Refer to ASX Announcement of 19 December 2020
7
Figure 7. Map of Novales-Udias Project Licence Areas
Figure 8. Map of Novales-Udias Project Licence Areas and local infrastructure
8
Competent Person Statement
The information in this document that relates to technical information about the Novales-Udias project is based on, and
fairly represents information and supporting documentation compiled and reviewed by Dr. Mike Mlynarczyk, Principal
of the Redstone Exploration Services, a geological consultancy acting as an external consultant for Variscan Mines. Dr.
Mlynarczyk is a Professional Geologist (PGeo) of the Institute of Geologists of Ireland, and European Geologist (EurGeol)
of the European Federation of Geologists, as well as Fellow of the Society of Economic Geologists (SEG). With over 10
years of full-time exploration experience in MVT-style zinc-lead systems in several of the world’s leading MVT provinces,
Dr. Mlynarczyk has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under
consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the December
2012 edition of the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves” (‘JORC Code’). Dr. Mlynarczyk consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based upon the
information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this document that relates to previous exploration results was prepared pre-2012 JORC code. It is
the opinion of Variscan that the exploration data is reliable. Although some of the data is incomplete, nothing has come
to the attention of Variscan that causes it to question the accuracy or reliability of the historic exploration.
Forward Looking Statements
Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guaranteed. They are subject to known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, some of which are outside the control of the Company. Past performance is not
necessarily a guide to future performance and no representation or warranty is made as to the likelihood of
achievement or reasonableness of any forward-looking statements or other forecast. The occurrence of events in the
future are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance
or achievements to differ from those referred to in this announcement. Given these uncertainties, recipients are
cautioned not to place reliance on forward looking statements. Any forward-looking statements in this announcement
speak only at the date of issue of this announcement. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law and
the ASX Listing Rules, the Company, its directors, officers, employees and agents do not give any assurance or guarantee
that the occurrence of the events referred to in this announcement will occur as contemplated.
9
JORC Table 1, Sections 1 and 2
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling
techniques
• Nature and quality of sampling (e.g.
cut channels, random chips, or
specific specialised industry standard
measurement tools appropriate to
the minerals under investigation,
such as down hole gamma sondes,
or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning of
sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken
to ensure sample representativity
and the appropriate calibration of
any measurement tools or systems
used.
• Aspects of the determination of
mineralisation that are Material to
the Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industry standard’
work has been done this would be
relatively simple (e.g. ‘reverse
circulation drilling was used to
obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg
was pulverised to produce a 30 g
charge for fire assay’). In other
cases more explanation may be
required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent
sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types
(e.g. submarine nodules) may
warrant disclosure of detailed
information.
• Drill type (e.g. core, reverse
circulation, open-hole hammer,
rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core
diameter, triple or standard tube,
depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether
core is oriented and if so, by what
method, etc).
• Method of recording and assessing
core and chip sample recoveries
and results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample
recovery and ensure representative
nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists
between sample recovery and
grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to
preferential loss/gain of
•
Drilling
techniques
Drill sample
recovery
•
•
•
Drilling being reported has been sampled with industry best
practice methods (for the sake of representativeness - as full
core, because of its comparatively small diameter of 38 mm),
and the samples were sent to the accredited ALS Seville
laboratory for analysis. The samples are considered
representative and include waste intervals on the periphery of
mineralised intersections. It is assumed that the equipment used
was calibrated correctly as per the internal SOP’s at ALS.
The new drillholes reported are located in the southern part of
the San Jose Mine. All holes consist of underground diamond
drillholes and were sampled as full core from 25cm to 1.30m
sample length (average 1.00m) with at least a single 1m sample
either side to cover the periphery of the mineralised intersection.
The analytical method used by ALS is Zn-OG62h for Zinc and
Pb-OG62h for Lead, as well as Zn-AA07 for non-sulphide
(‘oxide’) zinc. These are considered appropriate for the deposit
type.
The new drillholes referred to in this press release are
underground diamond drillholes (core) completed using a Hilti
portable drill, at a core diameter of 38mm.
These new holes have not employed oriented core methods.
• Drill core recovery for this batch of underground drillholes was
good, in the 85.9 – 97.0% range (average. 91.4%). Drill core
recovery information has been formally recorded for all drillholes
at this time, as it forms part of the detailed core logging.
• No special methods have been used to maximise sample recovery
as its occasionally low values are not caused by core loss but are
related to presence of natural voids.
• The relationship between sample recovery and grade has not
been assessed thus far.
10
Criteria
Logging
JORC Code explanation
fine/coarse material.
• Whether core and chip samples have
been geologically and
geotechnically logged to a level of
detail to support appropriate
Mineral Resource estimation, mining
studies and metallurgical studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or
quantitative in nature. Core (or
costean, channel, etc) photography.
• The total length and percentage of
the relevant intersections logged.
Sub-sampling
techniques and
sample
preparation
• If core, whether cut or sawn and
whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
• If non-core, whether riffled, tube
sampled, rotary split, etc. and
whether sampled wet or dry.
• For all sample types, the nature,
quality and appropriateness of the
sample preparation technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted
for all sub-sampling stages to
maximise representativity of
samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the
sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for
instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are
appropriate to the grain size of the
material being sampled.
Quality of assay
data and
laboratory tests
• The nature, quality and
appropriateness of the assaying and
laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered
partial or total.
• For geophysical tools,
spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the parameters used
in determining the analysis including
instrument make and model, reading
times, calibrations factors applied
and their derivation, etc.
• Nature of quality control procedures
adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias)
and precision have been established.
Commentary
• Detailed geological and geotechnical logging has been carried
out for all reported drillholes. Currently there is sufficient
geotechnical and geological logging data to support a Mineral
Resource estimate, which was recently completed.
• Total percentage of holes that have been logged for lithology,
veins, alteration, and mineralisation is 100% and the total
percentage of new drillholes that has detailed recovery and
geotechnical logging is 100% at this stage (based on all logs
available). All of the drill core from the reported batch was
photographed before sampling, which was especially important,
as unlike some of the previous underground drilling campaigns of
Variscan Mines, full core was assayed this time.
• New drillholes have been sampled using reasonable industry
procedures for logging (of mineralisation), sampling, and QAQC
for this project.
• The samples were selected by geologists for these new drillholes
based on logging of mineralised intervals, and full core was
sampled. Samples were preferred at 1m lengths, although they
were permitted flexibility from 25cm to 1.30m sample lengths
where geological boundaries existed. A minimum of three samples
were taken for any mineralised intersection, the first sample
encompassing the mineralised zone and the other two samples
selected either side to ensure waste intervals were sampled to
define the boundaries of mineralisation. Additionally, when a
separate geological zone of rubble or broken core began, a new
sample was taken and when solid core resumed the next samples
were selected. In zones of poor recovery <80% the default
sample intervals were the drillers depth markers. The nature and
quality of sampling techniques are considered appropriate for
this deposit and drilling type.
• All full core samples were sent directly to ALS Seville laboratory
for preparation and subsequent analysis, according to industry
standards with crushing, pulverizing and splitting prior to sample
analysis.
• Sample sizes taken for the drilling reported (i.e., full core) are
considered suitable for the deposit type and style of
mineralisation at this stage of exploration.
• For the new drilling reported the sampling is considered total as
no drill core remains. The laboratory is accredited (ALS Seville)
and the techniques for Zn/Pb (Zn-OG62h, Pb-OG62h, and ZnAA07) are considered suitable for the elements in question.
• No handheld or downhole geophysics data were collected during
this campaign.
• QAQC Procedures adopted for this batch of drilling results
included a total of fourteen QAQC samples inserted into the
sample stream (total of 118 drill core samples, not including
QAQC). These included one high-grade CRM (OREAS 134B)
inserted into the mineralised zone, two medium grade CRMs
(OREAS 133A) and six low grade CRMs (OREAS 130) inserted in
between waste rock or barren samples, as well as one blank. Also,
internal duplicates were requested to ALS for four mineralised
samples and these sample ID’s were indicated to the laboratory.
In total, for the batch of samples reported within this press release
the QAQC samples comprised 10.6% of the sample population
submitted for analysis. This frequency and variety of QAQC
11
Criteria
Verification of
sampling and
assaying
Location of data
points
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
• The verification of significant
intersections by either independent
or alternative company personnel.
• The use of twinned holes.
• Documentation of primary data,
data entry procedures, data
verification, data storage (physical
and electronic) protocols.
• Discuss any adjustment to assay
data.
•
• Accuracy and quality of surveys used
to locate drill holes (collar and
down-hole surveys), trenches, mine
workings and other locations used in
Mineral Resource estimation.
• Specification of the grid system
used.
• Quality and adequacy of
topographic control.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
samples inserted into the sample stream is considered reasonable;
with industry best practice typically requiring 10-20% of the
sample population to be QAQC samples in the sample stream.
The QAQC sample results were interpreted and showed good
repeatability.
Analytical processes are being supervised by senior ALS staff
experienced in mineral assaying.
The new diamond drillholes are located below the historic stopes
of the southern part of the San Jose underground mine.
Primary data for this underground drilling campaign is currently
stored in excel and all assay certifications and final assay results
provided by ALS Seville have been reviewed.
Assay data are reported in two ways within this press release, the
first are raw assay values unchanged or altered, and the second
are calculated significant intercepts or aggregated consecutive
sample intervals using sample length weighted mean grades for
Zn and Pb, assuming an ore grade of zero for the intervals with
missing drill core (natural voids).
The underground drillhole collars from the Variscan Mines drilling
campaigns were initially surveyed using the Nortop Ingenieros
S.L.U Total Station determined points and using an 'all-in-one’
laser disto device (incorporating digital compass, clinometer and
distance meter) placed on a 4kg tripod to avoid movements and
a topographic rod (with bubble level) to mark the position of the
Nortop points. Checks were made with a Brunton compass to
verify that there were no measurements errors. Several checks
were made with Nortop points bases obtaining the same results.
These are considered relatively accurate.
Subsequently, both the Variscan Mines and all of the historical
underground drill collars were systematically resurveyed by
physical in-situ inspection and using the data cloud of the 3D laser
survey of the San Jose mine drifts and stopes realized by
Variscan Mines in the years 2020-2022. All of the collar
locations were then cross-checked with detailed historical mine
plans. In addition, for every drill collar surveyed, the drill trace
azimuth and inclination were measured in situ using a Brunton
compass and checked across the historical drill records.
All the maps and 3D models referenced in this report have been
made with ETRS89.
Surface topography was provided by CNIG (IGN) as
topographic contours at 25k scale, the contours were used to
generate a digital terrain model in 3D after transformation to
the local mine grid to conform to the majority of drillhole data in
Leapfrog Geo and Datamine StudioRM. It is considered
satisfactory for these purposes.
The San Jose mine 3D underground laser survey was conducted
by 3DMSI using a robotic total station to take the in-situ preexisting historical survey pin locations to use as reference points.
A “Z+F Imager 5050C laser scanner”, as well as a “Leica
Geosystems TS16 01 total station” for controlling positional
accuracy and a “Leica geosystems BLK-2-GO” for detailed
mapping of the tunnels and drives were used to capture data
inside stopes and drives at San Jose, and these data were
registered as a point cloud. The BLK-2-GO was controlled with
targets positioned with the TS16 on the corners of the drives.
12
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Data spacing
and distribution
• Data spacing for reporting of
Exploration Results.
• Whether the data spacing and
distribution is sufficient to establish
the degree of geological and grade
continuity appropriate for the
Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve
estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
• Whether sample compositing has
been applied.
• The reported drillholes have been drilled in various orientations
(both downward and upward) from drilling pads underground,
and their spacing is variable (see table in Appendix 1). At this
stage there is sufficient distribution of drillholes to support
geological and grade continuity for the main San Jose mine area.
However, the smaller peripheral zones require further exploration
to improve geological confidence in interpretation.
• Assay data for the new drillholes are reported in two ways within
this press release, the first are raw assay values unchanged or
altered and the second are calculated significant intersections or
aggregated consecutive sample intervals using sample length
weighted mean grades for Zn and Pb. There were occasional
sample intervals where drill core could not be obtained due to the
presence of natural cavities, these intervals were manually set to
0% Zn and 0% Pb prior to calculating mean grades for
intersections.
Orientation of
data in relation
to geological
structure
• Whether the orientation of sampling
achieves unbiased sampling of
possible structures and the extent to
which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
• If the relationship between the
drilling orientation and the
orientation of key mineralised
structures is considered to have
introduced a sampling bias, this
should be assessed and reported if
material.
Sample security
• The measures taken to ensure sample
security.
• Mineralisation at the project occurs as stratabound, sub-horizontal
and lenticular, following sub-vertical trends, and with lateral and
vertical extensions with a significant control by steeply-dipping
feeder fault zones. Mineralisation in this setting presents as ‘bags’
(pods) with sub-horizontal lenticular form. Due to the irregular
and/or variable nature of the mineralisation, an estimate of
potential bias through orientation of sampling has not been made.
• While the location of mineralisation centres on the Novales trend
follows a broad NNE strike, the orientation of distinct orebodies
on this trend is understood to be variable both in terms of strike
and dip. Underground drilling is often radial in nature, and no
comment can be made on the orientation of drilling in respect of
mineralisation orientation.
• New drillholes have been oriented at a variety of orientations
both drilling above and below (positive and negative dips) from
the main gallery level at present, similar to those drilled
historically to intersect mineralised lenses and corridors above and
below the main gallery level. These orientations are considered
appropriate for the geometry of this mostly lenticular MVT
mineralisation at San Jose.
• Samples were securely stored at the locked on-site core shed and
were handed directly to a courier for transport to ALS Seville.
Samples were logged and collected on site under supervision of
the responsible Variscan geologists.
Audits or
reviews
• The results of any audits or reviews
of sampling techniques and data.
• No detailed 3rd party audits have taken place regarding the
sampling techniques for new drillholes.
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Mineral
ten
Share your feedback
Discover